GMC Truck Forum banner

3141 - 3160 of 3209 Posts

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,872 Posts
Discussion Starter #3,141
Well. Gm didn’t disappoint us by making another ugly vehicle.

The assend is nice though. Interior is dumb with the floating screen that most other manufactures stopped using a few years ago
IMG_9128.png

IMG_9129.png

IMG_9130.png



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,872 Posts
Discussion Starter #3,144
You’re high.

It’s a sad day when the new ford lineup looks better


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,030 Posts
I think the Chevy front end works a lot better on the SUV than the trucks. My wife will likely end up with one some day.
 

·
Sportbar aficionado.
Joined
·
66 Posts
We just order new glass and replace them. But thats mostly on the ones with the power sliding I see the issues on
Glad to stumble upon this. I just bought a 2020 with the rear power sliding glass. I'll keep an eye on it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

·
n. fil-dert.
Joined
·
7,019 Posts
No thanks on the SUV. Looks just as ugly as the truck plus independent rear and hideous interior. GM lost me moving forward. I'd go back to an NBS before one of those.
 

·
Sportbar aficionado.
Joined
·
66 Posts
No thanks on the SUV. Looks just as ugly as the truck plus independent rear and hideous interior. GM lost me moving forward. I'd go back to an NBS before one of those.
You're not going to have much luck with Ford or Dodge either. The Durango is unibody, and the Expedition also has independent rear. GM is again playing catch up with the Tahoe.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,872 Posts
Discussion Starter #3,154
But the Durango is at least fast.

My sister bought a new R/T. The big white pig rips pretty hard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,675 Posts
But the Durango is at least fast.

My sister bought a new R/T. The big white pig rips pretty hard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Aweful on gas
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,872 Posts
Discussion Starter #3,156
Not much worse than a new GM suv with a 5.3 that they had as a loaner for a few weeks.
 

·
n. fil-dert.
Joined
·
7,019 Posts
The interwebz say 14 mpg city on the Durango that's pretty bad. That's what I was seeing on my lifted 05 Suburban.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SierraZ570

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,872 Posts
Discussion Starter #3,158
2020 tahoe 5.3 gets 15 city. and the 6.2 gets 14 city. SOOOOO

all the tech gm has put into their vehicles, and they still get the same mpg they did 20 years ago.
 

·
In Valor There Is Hope
Joined
·
8,269 Posts
But the Durango is at least fast.

My sister bought a new R/T. The big white pig rips pretty hard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The R/T is actually slower than an Acadia due to its weight lol

0-60 in 6.1 and 1/4 in 14.1
Vs
0-60 in 6.2 and 1/4 in 14.7

The weight kills the Durango


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
professional grade
Joined
·
4,090 Posts
Yea but what U also have to consider is that shit is a lot larger and heavier and substantially mo powa than 20 years ago.
 
3141 - 3160 of 3209 Posts
Top