[Ian]

There is a '92 sierra near me with the 6.2 diesel with 166k, auto, 4x4. $900, so whats the deal with these engines?

:hmm:

 

[Krisverde]

There is a '92 sierra near me with the 6.2 diesel with 166k, auto, 4x4. $900, so whats the deal with these engines?

:hmm:

i thought 92 had a 6.5 l, oh well anyways, there great on gas like matt said. and they are not the fastest thing around. but hell its a diesel.

 

[coonbottom]

i thought 92 had a 6.5 l, oh well anyways, there great on gas like matt said. and they are not the fastest thing around. but hell its a diesel.

Yuh, im pretty sure in 92 they went to the 6.5, could be wrong?
The 6.2 = junk
6.5 NA = little bit better.

Go ahead and get it if you can afford it. When the engine takes a crap swapping over to a gasser isnt that hard or pricey.

 

[Ian]

SOLD!!!




























But not to me :bawl:

 

[coonbottom]

Sucks dude, i would almost be willing to buy it for that price.

 

[catch2otwo]

eh 6.2 and 6.5 both sucked imo.

 

[ChevyCowboy]

well they sucked in one way awsome in others, I had a 1990 6.2 she was a turn honestly, could pull a freaken house though, and got awsome gas mileage, but she definently wasnt fast in any way